|
1
|
- McHenry Consultants, Inc.
- Cary, NC
- E-mail: info@mchenrysoftware.com
- Website: www.mchenrysoftware.com
|
|
2
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- Research Approach
- Results
- Discussion and Conclusions
- Future Plans
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Reduces or eliminates the need to manually iterate
- Provides testing and refinement of evidence match.
- Allows sensitivity testing of input variables
- Includes unlimited objective iterations
|
|
8
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Saves time!
- Time required for “best match” limited only by processor speed
|
|
9
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- Jones, SAE 750894
- “To make SMAC ‘user-orientated’ so that users can operate with ease”
- Found that it is “insufficient to iterate on rest positions alone”
|
|
10
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- Moffatt and Byrd, 1980 (DOT-HS-8-01820)
- Iterated impact speeds, steering & braking
- Limited by computer costs and capabilities
|
|
11
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- CRASH-97 – 1997, (SAE 970949)
- Used automatic iteration of SMAC for motions between separation and
rest to refine separation speeds
- Did not include collision simulation due to computational time
considerations
|
|
12
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- Research Approach
- With advent of gigahertz Pentium machines, iteration of complete SMAC
including collision feasible
- This project an extension of our prior work on CRASH-97 (SAE 970949)
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- What are important measures in any accident reconstruction?
- Trajectory measurements
- Damage measurements
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Trajectory measurements
- The approximate positions and orientations of the vehicles at impact
- The measured positions and orientations of the vehicles at rest
- Distance POI to POR for each vehicle
- Azimuth angle POI to POR for each vehicle
- Direction of the System Momentum
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Damage measurements:
- Damage width
- Damage depth
- Damage area
- Centroid of the damage region
- Clock direction of the approximate PDOF
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Collision responses highly nonlinear
- Any function minimization technique must handle step discontinuities
- Restarts to insure a global v local minimum
- Weighting factors to establish priorities
- Initially to grossly match evidence
- Secondarily to assist in refinement of match
- Auxiliary calculations and checks
- To help guide the iteration procedure
|
|
21
|
- Starting Values for ITERATION
- Original intent was simply for improvement
- CRASH-type interface and information
- CRASH original intent as SMAC preprocessor
- Information required:
- Impact positions and headings.
- Rest positions and headings.
- Wheel steer and drag
- Vehicle type and specifications
- Damage measurements.
|
|
22
|
- For Initial development and testing of SMACITER
- Used SMAC generated reconstructions based on the RICSAC tests
- Final testing of SMACITER
- Used ‘raw’ reported test results and other high confidence
reconstructions to test convergence ability of SMACITER
|
|
23
|
- Variables iterated
- Initial Speeds and Positions
- Steering and Braking
- Minor adjustments of steering and braking within ranges of uncertainty
during iteration
- Sideslip and Angular Velocity Options
- Provide ability to address control losses preceding impact
|
|
24
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- Research Approach
- Results
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- Research Approach
- Results
- Discussion and Conclusions
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
- SMACITER is a tool to aid and assist an accident investigation
- Feasibility of the automatic iteration of SMAC has been demonstrated
- This research represents the 1st validation of SMAC without
using Impact Speed as input
- SMACITER converges towards evidence match
- Yields impact velocities within ±12%
- Yields ΔV’s within ±8%
|
|
53
|
- CRASH serves its original purpose as a pre-processor for SMAC
- A correlation factor or “score” is a desirable means of ranking the
achieved match of evidence and thereby the quality and reliability of
the reconstruction
|
|
54
|
- What is SMAC?
- Why Automatically Iterate SMAC?
- Prior Work
- Research Approach
- Results
- Discussion and Conclusions
- Future Plans
|
|
55
|
- Additional refinements of SMACITER
- Complete comparison of SMACITER with all available full-scale tests
- Further evaluation of a correlation factor or “score” as a potential
measure of reconstruction accuracy
- Implementation of Restitution enhancements per SAE 970960
- 3D components – merging of 2 HVOSM vehicles with refined SMAC
|
|
56
|
- End of Presentation
- Thank you!
|