last updated June 12, 2009
Is there a SMAC features comparison table?
What is the difference between m-smac and the other versions of SMAC?
What is your initial license fee?
Do you charge a fee each year for maintenance/renewal?
Do you offer other versions of SMAC?
Have there been erroneous and misleading statements published about SMAC?
SMAC features comparison table*
|
|
m-smac | m-smacFX | WinSMAC | EDSMAC | HVE-2DSMAC | HVE-3DSMAC |
| Vendor | McHenry Software | VisualStatement | ARSoftware | Engineering Dynamics | Engineering Dynamics | Engineering Dynamics |
|
Approximate Cost? |
$2000 | $2000 | $769 | was $750,
no longer available |
$2000+ | $10,000+ |
|
Multiple license discount? |
yes | ?? | yes | n/a | yes | ?? |
|
Approx cost for extra license? |
$650-$1000 | ?? | ?? | n/a | ?? | ?? |
|
Annual Fee? |
$250-$500 | 0 | ?? | was ~$300 | ~$400+ | ~$1000+ |
|
Support Options |
||||||
|
Phone support? |
yes | yes | yes | $95 per incident FEE | ??** | ??** |
|
email support? |
yes | yes | yes | ?? | ?? | ?? |
|
response time? |
0-3 hrs | 0-3 hrs | ?? | ?? | ??** | ??** |
|
knowledgeable responses? |
yes | yes | yes | ?? | ??** | ??** |
|
Updates in response to requests for enhancements? |
Yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| Informative website? | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| Licensee only website with Q&A & news? | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| Updates posted to web? | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
|
Frequency of enhancements? |
very | ?? | ?? | no | no | no |
|
Platform? |
Win32 | Win32 | Win16 | DOS | Win16? | Win16? |
| Enhancements beyond original SMAC? | yes | yes | no | no | minor | minor |
|
Max # Vehicles |
3, (4 coming) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3+ |
|
polygon friction zones |
yes | upcoming | no | no | yes | yes |
|
vehicle databases included? |
yes | yes | yes | no | extra | extra |
|
optional individual tire friction? |
yes | upcoming | no | no | no | yes |
|
Output time histories? |
yes | yes | ?? | with effort | with effort | with effort |
|
impulsive constraint 'snag'*** |
yes | upcoming | no | no | no | no |
|
CCI option*** |
yes | upcoming | no | no | no | no |
|
Steer Degree of Freedom?*** |
yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
|
tire blowout ability? |
yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
|
barrier option? |
yes | no | no | no | no | no |
|
output in format for spreadsheet programs? |
yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
|
acceleration monitor at any location? |
yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
|
outputs in format for ATB? |
yes | no | no | no | no | no |
|
output in format for Lightwave? |
yes | no | no | no | no | no |
|
measured damage targets display? |
yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
|
POI/POR targets display? |
yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
|
4 wheel steering? |
yes | yes | no | no | no | ?? |
|
driver model/path follower? |
yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
|
animation |
robust | robust | marginal | marginal | yes | yes |
|
animation autopan/autozoom? |
yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
|
DXF/CAD support? |
yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
|
tabular display option? |
yes | no | no | no | no | no |
|
bitmap underlays? |
yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
|
options vehicle-fixed display? |
yes | yes | no | no | no | ?? |
|
simplified occupant kinematics model? |
yes | no | no | no | no | no |
|
Articulated vehicle option? |
yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
|
trailer collision model? |
yes | no | no | no | no | no |
|
trailer release option? |
yes | no | no | no | no | no |
Please send any corrections/additions for this Comparison Table to webmaster@mchenrysoftware.com
*Note1: We have not included PC-CRASH in this comparison. PC-CRASH is a momentum based, instantaneous exchange of momentum program. It does not have the sophistication of the SMAC collision model which can lead to very serious problems and sensitivities for some impact configurations. For additional information please see the PC-CRASH sections of the SMAC-type computer programs page.
**Note2: This rating for technical support for EDC HVE is based on discussions with many current and/or former EDC HVE users who classify the response as slow and incomplete.
***Note3: For definitions of some of the terms the reader should review the paper SMAC-97. ('snag'=impulsive constraint, see pp71-73), CCI=Center of Collision Interface, see pp67-70, etc.) Note many of the items listed under OPTIONS are important enhancements which should be implemented in all versions of SMAC.
What is the difference between m-smac and the other versions of SMAC?
Raymond R. McHenry was the principal investigator and analytical developer for SMAC (as well as CAL2D, HVOSM & CRASH!). For over 22 years he and Brian G. McHenry have worked together as McHenry Consultants. Performing research and development on the various software programs as well as consulting on thousands of individual case reconstructions. As inventors of SMAC and as users of SMAC on a daily basis to reconstruct accidents, the McHenrys have created a refined and enhanced version of SMAC. Due to repeated requests from interested parties for a McHenry version of SMAC they formed McHenry Software in 1994.
Papers "SMAC-87",[McHenry, B.G. and McHenry, R. R., SAE Paper 88-0227, 1988 SAE Transactions] and "SMAC-97 - Refinement of the Collision Algorithm" [McHenry, B.G., McHenry, R.R., SAE Paper No. 97-0947, 1997 SAE Transactions] contain documentation of needed extensions and refinements of SMAC. SMAC was created in the 1970's on mainframe computers and in the 1980's moved to mini-computers and then in the 1990's to PCs, and many of the initial limitations and simplifying assumptions of SMAC must be revisited and refined. Please review SAE papers SMAC-87 and SMAC-97 for a detailed discussion and presentation.
The other vendors of SMAC (Engineering Dynamics (EDSMAC, HVE SMAC) and ARsoftware (WinSMAC) have not made any significant changes or improvements to the SMAC program. They merely sell the original SMAC program with a Windows wrapper.
Please see our discussion on the various versions of SMAC and our m-smac page for a list of some of the extensions and refinements of the SMAC program in m-smac.
What is your initial license fee?
Our initial license fee is available on our order form. We offer discounts for Government, Education and Research. Our pricing reflects a substantial discount compared with ED stuff ($750 for the no longer available DOS version, and no changes in 10 years), HVE-2D stuff ($2000+ and little changes except to move in line with the HVE 3D stuff) and/or Win SMAC ($769). Our program has enhancements well beyond EDSMAC, HVE SMAC and/or WinSMAC. We continually add and refine and respond to request from our users.
Do you charge a fee each year for maintenance/renewal?
Software for accident reconstruction requires continual review, update and enhancements. And all users should use the latest to insure that they have all the tools available. Therefore we require an annual fee to support our continued research and development of the software.
Many users who come to McHenry Software are former or current customers of EDC. EDC charges $250 or more for an annual 'maintenance' fee. The $250 paid to EDC was and is for nothing. Zilch! No improvements, No tech support.
Our $500 renewal fee is reinvested 100% in development and tech support. We maintain and update a website and respond in a very timely manner to users questions, problems and requests for enhancements/additions/etc. Also, we also offer a 'quick pay' discount for renewals of 10%-20%. So the actual cost is $400 to $450 for prompt and knowledgeable support. Please also note that we discount the renewal fee for additional licensees at any particular company. Please see the Order form for more information.
Do you offer other versions of SMAC?
McHenry Software has teamed with VisualStatement to add a version of m-smac called msmacFX. Please see our information page on msmacFX.
m-smacRT is no longer a valid program. Any use of msmacRT is software piracy. Please see our information page on msmacRT.
Have there been erroneous and misleading statements published about SMAC?
Over the years, several papers have taken cheap shots at SMAC (some funded by automobile manufacturers, and some as thinly veiled sales pitches for other software). As a service to SMAC users we offer a page with explanations of the erroneous and misleading statements about SMAC and CRASH.
Please also read:
- SAE TOPTEC Presentation SMAC Computer Model
This page is under construction. Please revisit soon for additional notes and information.
If you have any questions or feedback we can be reached by e-mail at McHenry@mchenrysoftware.com